Archive for the ‘Web’ Category

Socially selfish

Wednesday, December 9th, 2009

memeFor a decade or so we have been on a verge of a new social scheme. It’s not replacing the old ones, but rather it has added a whole new layer of interaction between people. In some ways, its also changing the other schemes. The internet is a game changer.

Though it comprises of many things like new additions to language and so on, the most striking thing about it is a new type of socially interacted individualism. Actually, the concept itself is not new, it has been talked for a while. There are many good papers on a framework called social individualism. But the internet has brought a new arena for it.

What it means is that people behave differently – more from an individual point of view – when their supposed interlocutors (or audience if you will) are not immediately present (yet still exist as a social interactive community). It is even more so, when their own identity is concealed, but it does happen with known identities nonetheless. We self-actualize our existence for others, in other words, we try to establish ourselves to others. People want to be heard and understood, and the web has brought a new way to do it.

Facebook or twitter would be the most obvious examples. We publish our thoughts and our goings as status updates and hope to get as broad audience as possible. While it’s social, as in there are multiple people involved and there is a possibility for feedback, the core is quite individualistic. We tout ourselves, our thoughts, things we bought, our children’s doings and things of that nature to others. Though there are sometimes conversations about our updates, the things mostly revolve around ourselves. The status update is indeed what it sounds: an update where we try to make our social status better. This is not to say every status update is of this nature, just that many of them are. Different forums on the net are even more like this, since in most cases we write there without our identities. The link between the communicator and the audience is even lighter then, thus making the interaction resemble more like a shout competition rather than a conversation. But it’s still social, as it has a way of feedback and it is thrown on a social arena unlike in the case of radio broadcast or a book. Many times the communication reduces to the level of toilet-writings, although luckily there has been considerable progress in this area. People are slowly starting to learn the proper conduct.

It is interesting to note, that whenever we are relatively free of social pressure, we easily tend to use that opportunity for our individual needs. Humans are of that nature.

Moderation and justice

Monday, June 22nd, 2009

riaaThis week in the federal jury in Minneapolis ruled that a Minnesota woman Jammie Thomas violated several music copyrights, and gave this poor mother of two children a “fine” of 1,92 million dollars – for sharing 24 songs in the net. That makes 80.000 dollars per song.

Idiots.

Many can probably agree, that the restitution sums in the States have been quite big, but this is just madness. Seems the sense of justice of that court has gone out to run a better business licking RIAA’s boots. The fine equals around 80.000 downloads per song from iTunes. Naturally if you share a song in the net, any number of people can download it from you, but fining someone 80.000 times of the worth of the item is just not in the galaxy of right proportions. Even big music makers and artists like Moby see this as a total lack of reason from the court and RIAA.

Moderation would be the key word here. I would argue, that it is the single most important virtue of a court. Without it, real justice isn’t being achieved. But the case shows, that the court in case has descended from the level of moderate justice to the level of lustful revenge. Being a small scale artist, that hopes to publish something in the future I’m all for the artist. But as Moby sees as well, this kinda greedy drysucking the record industry does by no means benefit the artist, but rather the company behind it.

Times have changed, and the industry needs to change with them. Hanging into these kind of judgements is grasping into straws when you’re drowning.

FAIL

Sunday, May 31st, 2009

There is this quite interesting internet meme called FAIL. It and its cousin (epic fail) first were used mainly in gaming, but these days they have reached a more universal status – to a point they are quite much used in live conversations aswell. What is quite interesting is, why we like to point out something is a failure. It sets the sayer to a higher position, from where that person can pass his/her judgement. Using the meme FAIL that person can thus sense self gratification and ownership of some information the other (whoever failed miserably) clearly didn’t have. Basicly it boils down to the fact we like to laugh at someone else’s stupidity. FAIL used to be the extreme case, but since the growing popularity of the meme, its power is inflating somewhat. There are even blogs for the meme and meme-videos in youtube about it.

FAIL is the real life counterpart to slapstick humor. Probably it works so well just because its real. The whole thing probably started, because nerds so much like to be right and show it. Since then its becoming a new word for social interaction, and something you should know to keep in touch with the times.

And it’s pretty self explanatory, what more needs to be said, than a single word?

So what’s with these christians anyway?

Sunday, April 5th, 2009

Today I stumbled on a video on youtube, which made me laugh myself off my chair. Those ROFL-type of moments if you will. There are elements in the video, that don’t echo well on the more thin skinned, but it was just so hilarious take on Christianity (and to me without a bad tone, or at least it mocks everyone evenly :) ) so I thought I’d share it:

A bit after the midway Eddie Izzard talks about gospel singers. And it actually got me thinking the perseverance of the black slaves. I recently watched a movie called Amazing Grace, which is sort of the British version of Amistad. It tells a story about William Wilberforce, trying to abolish the slave trade. Anyways, despite the horrible persecution and abuse, the black slaves gave birth to some extraordinary Christian music, capturing the intense feeling of salvation. They are songs of dreams and winning, not on this world, but the transcendent one.

Perhaps we cannot sing in a great passion, until we have lost and / or won something great. We convene at our hobbyclubs (the churches) and live our lives in an easygoing society. We can’t really win anything big, if we havent lost it all first. Our middleclass lives are so fulfilling from an economical standpoint, that we really dont care that much. And if we don’t care, we don’t feel. Wealth can make people dull and grey.

Where could we find the passion for love and grace?

To see, hear and talk or to talk?

Thursday, April 2nd, 2009

During the years I’ve spent on different web communities and talked endless hours through messenger I’ve begun to analyze the communication itself, which happens through a very dry medium. Normally, as all know, we communicate through so many ways, with our words covering only about 10-30% of the communication itself, depending on what theory we choose. Our movements, our tone, our facial expressions, they all contribute greatly to what we are trying to convey. On the net, that is all lost. Infact, in many cases, even our whole identity is hidden. This has a few interesting effects, though they are not neccessarily good or bad. It really depends on the situation.

One such effect is, that it is much harder to have a complex view of someone, when we have such little information about him / her (if we even know the sex). People get reduced to small ideas and we tend to regard them as more black and white. This is even more enhanced, if, let’s say in a chat a person chooses to use an idea or symbol in his / her nickname. It even happens, if we know the person in real life and have met that person face to face. It’s a curious phenomenon, which I think tracks down to the fact, that we lose so much information when talking with just text. Sometimes this can be a good thing, if we want to focus on a certain idea or topic. In many times, its a hinderance though, and thats why we have created some means to alleviate the pain.

One such mean would be the use of smilies and emoticons. In a simple way, we try to convey feelings through a medium, which at first seems quite resistant to them. And they work very well. The downside of them is, that they arent very subtle. They cover a few of very basic emotions (even though there are alot of them), but they don’t communicate subtle differences. Not only that, they aren’t always interpreted the same way. For example, the smilie : P can be taken to mean that one is dissappointed, frustrated or even that he / she is being rude. But still, smilies are a good way to enrich the textual communication.

There are countercurrents on this aswell. One could think, that since many of the other sources of information are silent, we would put extra effort in words and writing. Alas, it is slow, and slow is not good these days. Acronyms have come common, since writing text is so much slower than talking, and its not happening real time. Probably the most used would be LOL, which is a short for Laughing Out Loud. The problem with acronyms is, that they reduce the information even more, since they are generic statements. They can also be used in different meanings. LOL used to be more of a taunting expression, but then it came to be a generic expression of laughter. One just has to take the context and try to decipher if the user of LOL is using a taunting or a praising tone. Some people, usually older ones are taking quite a negative standing against acronyms, but I would advice against it, since there is a very good reason they have surfaced, and we should learn from it and develop them further.

Most of these are ways to make textual conversation better by making it easier and / or richer. What the future holds in this area, is yet to be seen, but one thing is important: we should definently not swim against the communication currents, but rather understand why they are there, and refine them to a higher level. There are many very important things to be achieved in the world, of which many start with getting people to understand each other better.